Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 13:13
What’s next?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Looks Like Ye and Bianca Censori Are Going Strong - The Cut
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Aut perferendis voluptatibus eum sapiente officiis est explicabo itaque.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Triassic reptiles took 10,000 mile trips through 'hellish' conditions, study suggests - Phys.org
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
A Common Stimulant Could Hold the Key to Preventing Sudden Infant Death Syndrome - SciTechDaily
Thank you.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Nemo harum distinctio cupiditate soluta nesciunt beatae harum.